‘Road’ ~ By Jim Cartwright:
My interpretation of the text began when we were first
introduced to Road, was as the character Valerie [see Blog Post 1] however, a more relevant approach to my text
interpretations would come under the character I played, Louise. Beginning with
her first scene, I knew immediately that this brother and sister relationship was
odd-he is extremely intimidating towards her, but not just in a ‘brotherly way’. Reading into this: their parents clearly don’t
care to much for their children, ‘where’s
mum and dad?’, which lead me to thinking that their father used to abuse ‘brother’.
I say this with the knowledge that our childhoods hugely effect who we are now;
which can often mean, if someone is aggressive, intimidating and abusive it is
often, all down to their childhood. I knew that to master this scene, I had to
use my reactioning as well as Jake having to create a really intimidating
character. This purely came with practise and feed-back . My second feature in
Road, as Louise; is an entrance in Brenda and Carol’s scene. Stupidly enough,
my first text interpretations of- ‘my
shoulder pads slipped’- was that this was her actual shoulder pad- hear me
out! This was a means for her to cover up her entering in a rush, she is a
quiet character so any excuse she could use to distract people from her real
emotions she would use an petty excuse. After
researching more I gathered that this was in relevance to an ‘outfit shoulder
pad’. My final scene had a lot of subtle text interpretations I could take from
Louise; such as ‘Carol you’re terrible’
which highlights that Louise likes these boys, and is apprehensive that Carol
is going to ruin it for her. This also proves that Louise isn't this quiet,
tag-along character I had first put name to her.
My engagement during college rehearsals, I think was of a
good level. I made the consistent effort to be active especially during the
sessions in which I wasn't needed practically. By doing this, I was both
helping myself as an actor, as well as helping others. My personal management,
I also believe was of a good level, I had my lines learnt early on and I also
had a good understanding of Louise from an early stage which helped me with my
research as well as keeping on top of my on-line blogging process- which all
links into my time management. This project has proven to me, more so, that I
work well in a group and so it was nice to be in a group who made it easy for
me to put in my ideas and interpretations, due to us all getting on well. With
that said, I think we all responded well to our feedback. Personally, I know
that I went away and worked on looking back through my feedback and practising
these changes at home to bring into proper practise the following college day. And
all this definitely resulted in a positive effect both in rehearsals and in the
performances themselves.
I fully believe my development through the means of Louise
has come a long way this first starting this project. The feedback given to me
has been a really, really big part of this as well as the feedback I gave to
other characters. I did a lot of experimenting as Louise, starting her off as a
quiet character, with no real backstory and just a simple tag-along to Carol.
She then turned out to be the opposite of a ‘tag-along’ thanks to a bit of experimentation
especially when trying to boost up my performance of the monologue in which I
really wanted to make punchy to prove her ‘unseen side.’ The accent was one of
the two largest experimentations done, it took me a lot of work/practise to
master the accent which included ‘experimenting’ in our rehearsal sessions
despite the fact it was still weak in those early days. The second would be the
costume designs, which [see Blog 7 onwards] originally became something very
much in my comfort zone, and ended up the complete opposite. Risks were taken
through the means of slight improvisation which featured through improvised
text, reactions and dancing; especially the dancing which was something I found
difficult. So was the development of Louise as I knew I didn’t want her to be
like me. My interpretations have really developed from those early days in
which I was beginning to regret choosing her as a character in fear she was too
much like me-quiet, and as a character, probably quite uninteresting. She was
the total opposite, she had so many hidden meanings which proved really
interesting to uncover as we I developed, such as her ‘difficult’ parents and
upbringing.
The two performances were a success, with the evening being
even more so than the matinee; personally. I felt I delivered with a lot more
energy than the matinee. I felt my consistency of Louise was strong, and this
included my accent (however I did lose it once, ‘she’s gone off because she likes you really’) physically I was definitely
not myself; I was Louise with my reactions and interactions ensuring even if
accidents happened i.e. me and Lewis spilling a drink, I stayed in character ~
This commitment lead me to constantly thinking of ‘how would Louise react’. Especially
backstage in which I kept my energy up with pacing in the wings. With past
experiences I understand the audience’s position, so my audience engagement
meant I knew how to get them to react, for example making my acting as
realistic as possibly to make it relatable i.e. the kiss. I felt confident with Louise in the performances,
I felt fully dedicated to her and I also felt my work dedicated towards
developing her as character paid off.
My strengths definitely lay in the written process, I love
doing the blogs incorporating other character interpretations, as well as my
own character, opinions and ideas about Road, extra research as well as
feedback notes given by myself or given to me. I thrive off of being able to go
away and write my own opinions in the comfort of myself as such, it’s a
confidence thing. I enjoyed doing the research I did, as well as those I did
for other characters as I felt I really knew Road by the end of it. My weakness
would be my confidence. I could've really excelled in questioning directing
notes in a positive way, in order to really understand our adaptation of the
play. And I know I could've given the rehearsals a lot more, such as the first
try of the ‘dancing’ scene.
My targets definitely consist of continuation of confidence
work. But to also keep up on my organised blogging as well as my well-planned
character work which was heavily practised at home as well as in college; which
all paid off. For my next performance, I
need to move even further away from my own characterisation- especially as
Louise was a lot closer to home than Rachel (from ‘13’, Mike Bartlett) was. A
female version of Bisto… One day!
No comments:
Post a Comment